On the Application of Fraud Theory in the Field of Labor Contract

Wentao Li

doi:doi:10.11648/j.jhrm.20180602.12

| Peer-Reviewed

On the Application of Fraud Theory in the Field of Labor Contract

Wentao Li

Published in Journal of Human Resource Management (Volume 6, Issue 2)

Received: 1 June 2018 Accepted: 14 June 2018 Published: 10 July 2018

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Judging whether a female employee's concealment of the fact of pregnancy constitutes fraud at the time of the conclusion of the labor contract requires starting from the constitutive elements of fraud and proceeding from the objectivie to subjective logical deduction-type argumentation analysis. Female employees generally have no obligations to actively inform the facts of pregnancy, and they passively conceal the silence of pregnancy facts which do not constitute fraud. Pregnancy generally does not belong to the important nature of female workers. The wrong statement of the female worker’s pregnancy status does not constitute an important error. Female employees’ false statements about the fact of pregnancy are generally not illegal and do not constitute fraud.

Published in	Journal of Human Resource Management (Volume 6, Issue 2)
DOI	10.11648/j.jhrm.20180602.12
Page(s)	50-57
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2018. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Fraud, Error, Labor Contract

References

[1]	Da Yiren, An Introduction to Criminal Law, translated by Feng Jun, Renmin University of China Press, 2003, p. 111.
[2]	Blox, The General Theory of German Civil Law, translated by Zhang Yan, Chinese people University Press, 2012, pp. 272-281.
[3]	Wolfgang Doyle Pler, The German Labor Law, translated by Wang Qian, Shanghai People's Publishing 2016, pp. 140-156.
[4]	Dutz, Labor Law, translated by Zhang Guowen, Law Press 2005, pp. 39-40.
[5]	Raymond Walterman, German Labor Law, translated by Shen Jianfeng, Law Press, 2014, p. 136-145.
[6]	Karl Larenz, The General Theory of German Civil Law, translated by Wang Xiaoye etc., Law Press, 2007, pp. 485-491.
[7]	Karl Larenz, The General Theory of German Civil Law, translated by Wang Xiaoxuan etc., Law Press, 2007, pp. 542-543.
[8]	Werner Flume, The Legal Act, translated by Chi Ying, Law Press, 2013, pp. 644-647.
[9]	Shi Shangkuan, The General Civil Law, China University of Political Science and Law Press, 2000, pp. 407-408.
[10]	Woqi Rong, The General Principles of the New Civil Law, translated by Qu Tao, Chinese Legal Publishing House, 2009, pp. 288-290.
[11]	Jinjiang Xingzhi, The Civil Law Lecture I General Principles of Civil Law, translated by Qu Tao, Peking University Press, 2015, p. 205.
[12]	Shanben Jingsan, Civil Law Lecture I General Principles, translated by Xie Gen, Peking University Press, 2012, pp. 181-187.
[13]	Hans Thoma, Bürgerlichen Recht Allgemeiner Teil, Verlag W. Kohlhammer, 1975, pp. 188-189.
[14]	Wang Zejian, General Principles of Civil Law, China University of Political Science and Law Press, 2001, p. 377.
[15]	Dieter Medicus, Allgemeiner Teil des BGB, CFMüller Verlag Heidelberg, 2006, pp. 311-312.
[16]	Hans Thoma, Bürgerlichen Recht Allgemeiner Teil, Verlag W. Kohlhammer, 2005, pp. 188-189.
[17]	Huang Yueqin, New Theory of Labor Law, China University of Political Science and Law Press, 2003, p. 125.
[18]	Dieter Medicus, General Theory of German Civil Law, Translated by Shao Jiandong, Legal Press 2006, p. 602.
[19]	Shanben Jingsan, The General Principles of Civil Law Lecture I, translated by Xie Gen, Peking University Press, 2012, p. 166.
[20]	Shanben Jingsan, The General Principles of Civil Law Lecture I, translated by Xie Gen, Peking University Press, 2012, p. 186.
[21]	Jingjiang Xingzhi, Civil Law Lecture I General Principles of Civil Law, translated by Qu Tao, Peking University Press, 2015, p. 205.
[22]	Hanns Prütting, Gerhard Wegen, Gerd Weinreich, BGB Kommentar, Luchterhand, 2010, pp. 113 -115.
[23]	Werner Flume, The Legal Act, translated by Chi Ying, Legal Press, 2013, pp. 516-529.
[24]	Dutz, Labor Law, translated by Zhang Guowen, Law Press, 2005, pp. 46-48.
[25]	Karl Larenz, Allgemeiner Teil des Bürgerlichen Rechts, Verlag C. H. Beck Müchen, 2004, p. 661.
[26]	Shi Shangkuan, “General Theory of Civil Law”, China University of Political Science and Law Press, 2000, pp. 407-408.
[27]	Hans Thoma, Bürgerlichen Recht Allgemeiner Teil, Verlag W. Kohlhammer, 2005, pp. 186-187.
[28]	Dutz, Labor Law, translated by Zhang Guowen, Law Publishing House, 2005, pp. 46-48.
[29]	Woqi, Rong, The General Principles of the New Civil Law, translated by Qu Tao, China Legal Publishing House, 2009, pp. 288-290.
[30]	Hong Xunxin, General Principles of China Civil Law, 1993, pp. 404-406.
[31]	A. C. L. Davies, Perspectives on Labour Law, Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 122-135.
[32]	Deborah J. Lockton, Employment Law, Palgrave Macmillan, 2003, pp. 129-130.
[33]	Raymond Walterman, German Labor Law, translated by Shen Jianfeng, Legal Press, 2014, pp. 136-145.
[34]	Diete Medicus, Allgemeiner Teil des BGB, CFMüller Verlag Heidelberg, 2006, pp. 311-312.
[35]	Katherine Barnard, EU Labor Law, translated by Fu Yan, Chinese Legal Publishing House, 2005, pp. 286-296.
[36]	Hanns Prütting, Gerhard Wegen, Gerd Weinreich, BGB Kommentar, Luchterhand, 2010, pp. 113-115.
[37]	Karl Larenz, Allgemeiner Teil des Bürgerlichen Rechts, Verlag CH Beck Müchen, 2004, p. 684.
[38]	Dutz, Labor Law, translated by Zhang Guowen, Law Press 2005, pp. 39-40.
[39]	Wolfgang Doyle Puller, The German Labor Law, translated by Wang Qian, Shanghai People’s Publishing House, 2016, pp. 140-156.
[40]	Pietro Pendev, Roman Law Textbook, translated by Huang Feng, China University of Political Science and Law Press, 1998, pp. 70-74.
[41]	Shi Shangkuan, General Civil Law, China University of Political Science and Law Press, 2000, pp. 424-426.
[42]	Werner Flume, The Legal Act, translated by Chi Yingying, Legal Press, 2013, pp. 644-647.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Wentao Li. (2018). On the Application of Fraud Theory in the Field of Labor Contract. Journal of Human Resource Management, 6(2), 50-57. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jhrm.20180602.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Wentao Li. On the Application of Fraud Theory in the Field of Labor Contract. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2018, 6(2), 50-57. doi: 10.11648/j.jhrm.20180602.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Wentao Li. On the Application of Fraud Theory in the Field of Labor Contract. J Hum Resour Manag. 2018;6(2):50-57. doi: 10.11648/j.jhrm.20180602.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.jhrm.20180602.12,
  author = {Wentao Li},
  title = {On the Application of Fraud Theory in the Field of Labor Contract},
  journal = {Journal of Human Resource Management},
  volume = {6},
  number = {2},
  pages = {50-57},
  doi = {10.11648/j.jhrm.20180602.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jhrm.20180602.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jhrm.20180602.12},
  abstract = {Judging whether a female employee's concealment of the fact of pregnancy constitutes fraud at the time of the conclusion of the labor contract requires starting from the constitutive elements of fraud and proceeding from the objectivie to subjective logical deduction-type argumentation analysis. Female employees generally have no obligations to actively inform the facts of pregnancy, and they passively conceal the silence of pregnancy facts which do not constitute fraud. Pregnancy generally does not belong to the important nature of female workers. The wrong statement of the female worker’s pregnancy status does not constitute an important error. Female employees’ false statements about the fact of pregnancy are generally not illegal and do not constitute fraud.},
 year = {2018}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - On the Application of Fraud Theory in the Field of Labor Contract
AU  - Wentao Li
Y1  - 2018/07/10
PY  - 2018
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jhrm.20180602.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.jhrm.20180602.12
T2  - Journal of Human Resource Management
JF  - Journal of Human Resource Management
JO  - Journal of Human Resource Management
SP  - 50
EP  - 57
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2331-0715
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jhrm.20180602.12
AB  - Judging whether a female employee's concealment of the fact of pregnancy constitutes fraud at the time of the conclusion of the labor contract requires starting from the constitutive elements of fraud and proceeding from the objectivie to subjective logical deduction-type argumentation analysis. Female employees generally have no obligations to actively inform the facts of pregnancy, and they passively conceal the silence of pregnancy facts which do not constitute fraud. Pregnancy generally does not belong to the important nature of female workers. The wrong statement of the female worker’s pregnancy status does not constitute an important error. Female employees’ false statements about the fact of pregnancy are generally not illegal and do not constitute fraud.
VL  - 6
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Wentao Li

School of Law, China University of Labor Relations, Peking, China

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Wentao Li. (2018). On the Application of Fraud Theory in the Field of Labor Contract. Journal of Human Resource Management, 6(2), 50-57. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jhrm.20180602.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Wentao Li. On the Application of Fraud Theory in the Field of Labor Contract. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2018, 6(2), 50-57. doi: 10.11648/j.jhrm.20180602.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Wentao Li. On the Application of Fraud Theory in the Field of Labor Contract. J Hum Resour Manag. 2018;6(2):50-57. doi: 10.11648/j.jhrm.20180602.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.jhrm.20180602.12,
  author = {Wentao Li},
  title = {On the Application of Fraud Theory in the Field of Labor Contract},
  journal = {Journal of Human Resource Management},
  volume = {6},
  number = {2},
  pages = {50-57},
  doi = {10.11648/j.jhrm.20180602.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jhrm.20180602.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jhrm.20180602.12},
  abstract = {Judging whether a female employee's concealment of the fact of pregnancy constitutes fraud at the time of the conclusion of the labor contract requires starting from the constitutive elements of fraud and proceeding from the objectivie to subjective logical deduction-type argumentation analysis. Female employees generally have no obligations to actively inform the facts of pregnancy, and they passively conceal the silence of pregnancy facts which do not constitute fraud. Pregnancy generally does not belong to the important nature of female workers. The wrong statement of the female worker’s pregnancy status does not constitute an important error. Female employees’ false statements about the fact of pregnancy are generally not illegal and do not constitute fraud.},
 year = {2018}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - On the Application of Fraud Theory in the Field of Labor Contract
AU  - Wentao Li
Y1  - 2018/07/10
PY  - 2018
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jhrm.20180602.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.jhrm.20180602.12
T2  - Journal of Human Resource Management
JF  - Journal of Human Resource Management
JO  - Journal of Human Resource Management
SP  - 50
EP  - 57
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2331-0715
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jhrm.20180602.12
AB  - Judging whether a female employee's concealment of the fact of pregnancy constitutes fraud at the time of the conclusion of the labor contract requires starting from the constitutive elements of fraud and proceeding from the objectivie to subjective logical deduction-type argumentation analysis. Female employees generally have no obligations to actively inform the facts of pregnancy, and they passively conceal the silence of pregnancy facts which do not constitute fraud. Pregnancy generally does not belong to the important nature of female workers. The wrong statement of the female worker’s pregnancy status does not constitute an important error. Female employees’ false statements about the fact of pregnancy are generally not illegal and do not constitute fraud.
VL  - 6
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download