Here we introduce "Pre-mining potentiality of mineral deposit" and gets marked "Ppm" under this methodology, which comprehensively represents the mining and geological conditions in the crust, the geologic parameters, study and calculation of mineral reserves, mining method, moreover assessments of other studies such as for operation, location and marketing capabilities, a warning forecast of the economic viability and environmental impact on nature. The pre-mining potentiality evaluation of mineral deposits can be considered as the most comprehensive pre-production assessment of a deposit, which makes it possible to compare it with other same type deposits and to assess and determine the priorities of this field. External factors, the method of mining development, production productivity, the technique and technology of the extraction system, the amount of capital investment, the professionalism and the capacity of management and financial capacity of the project executor, show the main effects on the actual magnitude of the final social and economic benefits that result from the overall implementation of the project. And the internal factors in it, deposits, mining and production and economic as well as environmental conditions, are the main foundation for those external factors. These internal factors need to be examined before operational phase or during mine development, with detailed study in the framework of consistent scientific research and consider clearly the logical and expected results of future mining operations. The following research works are carried out to develop a mineral deposit. Including: reconnaissance studies, geophysics, hydrogeology, geotechnical studies, resource delineation, evaluation work - a scoping study, preliminary and detailed feasibility studies, detailed environmental impact assessment. In international practice these research and evaluation works are called in general in Russian “предэксплуатационные исследования месторождения полезного ископаемого” and in English “pre-production evaluation for mineral deposit”. These works of research and analysis for the development of a deposit are not feasible simultaneously for all similar deposits, which require a lot of time and cost, therefore, the possibilities of evaluation and comparison are not obtained, and their priorities are not well determined. So, here a scientifically methodological question is being considered to evaluate the pre-mining potentiality, which is based on the influences of the internal factors of a given deposit, regardless of time and cost, for evaluation, comparing and ranking in general.
Published in | Science Journal of Energy Engineering (Volume 9, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.sjee.20210904.11 |
Page(s) | 42-50 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Pre-mining Potentiality, Classification of the Homogeneous Deposits, Mineable Potentiality, Industrial Potentiality, Economic Potentiality, Identical Deposits, Significance of Deposit, Productivity Orientation
[1] | Davaasambuu N. Research of evaluation of pre-mining potentiality for fluorite deposits (on the example of Mongolia). UB., Thesis. 2015. |
[2] | Botin J. A. Sustainable management of mining operations. SME. Colorado, USA. 2009. |
[3] | Brief information on mineral commodities of Mongolia (Nonmetals). Mineral Resources Authority of Mongolia. Geological Information Center. UB. 2012. |
[4] | Byamba-Yuu Zh., Tsedendorzh S. Technical and economical analysis of the mining enterprise. UB. 2009. |
[5] | Billiam Hustrulid., Mark Cuchta. Open pit Mine Planing and Design. London. 2006. |
[6] | Granin I. V. Study of the mining regime for low-power steeply dipping deposits of considerable length. M., MGRI. 1966. |
[7] | Guzeev A. G. Design and construction of mining enterprises. M. Nedra. 1987. |
[8] | Davaasambuu D., Davaatseren G., Purvee J. Financial and economic evaluation of the mineral resources. UB. 2003. |
[9] | Caterpillar Performance Handbook-39. U.S.A. 1979-20096 |
[10] | Laihansuren B., Parvev L., Ochirbat P., Haidav A., Mining engineer's handbook-6. Underground mining technology. UB. 2011. |
[11] | Melnikov N. V. Handbook on mining operations. M., Nedra, 1974. |
[12] | Ochirbat P., Tsedendorzh S., Purev L., Laihansuren B., Mining Engineer's Handbook-8. Economics, business and mining management. UB. 2012. |
[13] | Raymond L. Lowrie P. E. Mining Reference Handbook. SME. Colorrado, USA. 2002. |
[14] | Sumenkov M. S, Kislyak V. М. Chichkanov V. P, Optimal planning of the activity of industrial enterprises. M., 1980. |
[15] | Turbetskoy K. N, Potapov M. G, Vinitsky K. E, Melnikov N. N and others. Open Pit Handbook. M. Mountain Bureau, 1994. |
[16] | Fisenko G. L. Stability of the slope of open pit and dumps. M., Nedra, 1965. |
[17] | Howard L. Hartman. Mining Engineering Handbook. SME. Colorado, USA. 1992. |
[18] | Tsedendorzh S., Purev L. Fundamentals of mining technology. UB. 2005. |
[19] | Tsedendorzh S., Purev L., Laihansuren B., Haidav A., Mining Engineer's Handbook-5. Open Pit Technology. UB. 2011. |
[20] | Yumatov B. P. Technology of open pit operations with combined development of ore deposits. M., Nedra, 1966. |
APA Style
Davaasambuu Nachin. (2021). Evaluation Methodology for Pre-Mining Potentiaity for Mineral Deposits. Science Journal of Energy Engineering, 9(4), 42-50. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjee.20210904.11
ACS Style
Davaasambuu Nachin. Evaluation Methodology for Pre-Mining Potentiaity for Mineral Deposits. Sci. J. Energy Eng. 2021, 9(4), 42-50. doi: 10.11648/j.sjee.20210904.11
AMA Style
Davaasambuu Nachin. Evaluation Methodology for Pre-Mining Potentiaity for Mineral Deposits. Sci J Energy Eng. 2021;9(4):42-50. doi: 10.11648/j.sjee.20210904.11
@article{10.11648/j.sjee.20210904.11, author = {Davaasambuu Nachin}, title = {Evaluation Methodology for Pre-Mining Potentiaity for Mineral Deposits}, journal = {Science Journal of Energy Engineering}, volume = {9}, number = {4}, pages = {42-50}, doi = {10.11648/j.sjee.20210904.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjee.20210904.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjee.20210904.11}, abstract = {Here we introduce "Pre-mining potentiality of mineral deposit" and gets marked "Ppm" under this methodology, which comprehensively represents the mining and geological conditions in the crust, the geologic parameters, study and calculation of mineral reserves, mining method, moreover assessments of other studies such as for operation, location and marketing capabilities, a warning forecast of the economic viability and environmental impact on nature. The pre-mining potentiality evaluation of mineral deposits can be considered as the most comprehensive pre-production assessment of a deposit, which makes it possible to compare it with other same type deposits and to assess and determine the priorities of this field. External factors, the method of mining development, production productivity, the technique and technology of the extraction system, the amount of capital investment, the professionalism and the capacity of management and financial capacity of the project executor, show the main effects on the actual magnitude of the final social and economic benefits that result from the overall implementation of the project. And the internal factors in it, deposits, mining and production and economic as well as environmental conditions, are the main foundation for those external factors. These internal factors need to be examined before operational phase or during mine development, with detailed study in the framework of consistent scientific research and consider clearly the logical and expected results of future mining operations. The following research works are carried out to develop a mineral deposit. Including: reconnaissance studies, geophysics, hydrogeology, geotechnical studies, resource delineation, evaluation work - a scoping study, preliminary and detailed feasibility studies, detailed environmental impact assessment. In international practice these research and evaluation works are called in general in Russian “предэксплуатационные исследования месторождения полезного ископаемого” and in English “pre-production evaluation for mineral deposit”. These works of research and analysis for the development of a deposit are not feasible simultaneously for all similar deposits, which require a lot of time and cost, therefore, the possibilities of evaluation and comparison are not obtained, and their priorities are not well determined. So, here a scientifically methodological question is being considered to evaluate the pre-mining potentiality, which is based on the influences of the internal factors of a given deposit, regardless of time and cost, for evaluation, comparing and ranking in general.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Evaluation Methodology for Pre-Mining Potentiaity for Mineral Deposits AU - Davaasambuu Nachin Y1 - 2021/10/30 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjee.20210904.11 DO - 10.11648/j.sjee.20210904.11 T2 - Science Journal of Energy Engineering JF - Science Journal of Energy Engineering JO - Science Journal of Energy Engineering SP - 42 EP - 50 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2376-8126 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjee.20210904.11 AB - Here we introduce "Pre-mining potentiality of mineral deposit" and gets marked "Ppm" under this methodology, which comprehensively represents the mining and geological conditions in the crust, the geologic parameters, study and calculation of mineral reserves, mining method, moreover assessments of other studies such as for operation, location and marketing capabilities, a warning forecast of the economic viability and environmental impact on nature. The pre-mining potentiality evaluation of mineral deposits can be considered as the most comprehensive pre-production assessment of a deposit, which makes it possible to compare it with other same type deposits and to assess and determine the priorities of this field. External factors, the method of mining development, production productivity, the technique and technology of the extraction system, the amount of capital investment, the professionalism and the capacity of management and financial capacity of the project executor, show the main effects on the actual magnitude of the final social and economic benefits that result from the overall implementation of the project. And the internal factors in it, deposits, mining and production and economic as well as environmental conditions, are the main foundation for those external factors. These internal factors need to be examined before operational phase or during mine development, with detailed study in the framework of consistent scientific research and consider clearly the logical and expected results of future mining operations. The following research works are carried out to develop a mineral deposit. Including: reconnaissance studies, geophysics, hydrogeology, geotechnical studies, resource delineation, evaluation work - a scoping study, preliminary and detailed feasibility studies, detailed environmental impact assessment. In international practice these research and evaluation works are called in general in Russian “предэксплуатационные исследования месторождения полезного ископаемого” and in English “pre-production evaluation for mineral deposit”. These works of research and analysis for the development of a deposit are not feasible simultaneously for all similar deposits, which require a lot of time and cost, therefore, the possibilities of evaluation and comparison are not obtained, and their priorities are not well determined. So, here a scientifically methodological question is being considered to evaluate the pre-mining potentiality, which is based on the influences of the internal factors of a given deposit, regardless of time and cost, for evaluation, comparing and ranking in general. VL - 9 IS - 4 ER -