Ore Mineralization of Active Paleomargins of Continents (on the Example of Alpine Metallic Deposits of Caucasus and Pontides)

Sergo Kekelia; Nona Gagnidze; Ira Mshvenieradze; Giorgi Kharazishvili

doi:doi:10.11648/j.jenr.20211001.11

| Peer-Reviewed

Ore Mineralization of Active Paleomargins of Continents (on the Example of Alpine Metallic Deposits of Caucasus and Pontides)

Sergo Kekelia, Nona Gagnidze, Ira Mshvenieradze, Giorgi Kharazishvili

Published in Journal of Energy and Natural Resources (Volume 10, Issue 1)

Received: 2 December 2020 Accepted: 2 February 2021 Published: 23 February 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Metallogenic features of Pontides – Lesser Caucasus microplates (part of active paleomargin of Eurasian microplate are determined by copper, copper-molibdenium porphyry, iron-scarn, volcanic nonferrous, precious metals, auriferous and manganese ore deposits. Their orebearing fluid systems occurred consistently on various stages of development of the region and were correlated with geological processes on the border of convergental and divergental interaction of mic¬roplates. The above mentioned types of ore deposits display clear areal and temporary bonds with certain composites of lithogeodynamic complexes (which are presented in mountain folding systems of relics of ancient geomorphological structures) - geological formations. Different geologic-genetical models are suggested for each type of deposits, characterizing possible sources of ore substance, causes of rise and functions of fluid systems, in addition to ore formation environment. It may be said that different genetic groups of deposits are regularly associated with certain litho-geodynamic complexes. The complexes of the paleomarginal sea hollows of the divergent type are specialized in copper and pyrite-polimetallic hydrothermal-sedimentary mineralization; island arc systems of different age – in copper and copper-zinc hydrothermal-sedimentary and epigenetic mineralization; their uplifted blocks – in gold, copper-porphyry and skarn-iron-ore mineralization. Within the area of volcanic-sedimentary copper-zinc deposits in intra-arc sea hollows (Pontides) manganese accumulations are sometimes encountered.

Published in	Journal of Energy and Natural Resources (Volume 10, Issue 1)
DOI	10.11648/j.jenr.20211001.11
Page(s)	1-13
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Metallogeny, Deposit, Mineralization, Caucasus, Pontides

References

[1]	Vrielinck B (1994). Tethys – l’histoire d’un ocean disparu. Geochronique, No 52. Bureau du richerches geologiques et minieres Societe Geologique de France. P. 14-18.
[2]	Monin A. S, Zonenshain L. P (1987). Hystory of the ocean Tethys. Moscow Institute of Oceanology. 155 p. (in Russian).
[3]	Sosson M, Rolland Y, Muller C, Danelian T, Melkonyan R, Adamia Sh, Baba-Zade V, Kangarli T, Avagyan A, Galoyan1 G, Mosar J. (2010). Subductions, obduction and collision in the Lesser Caucasus (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia), new insights. In: Sedimentary Basin Tectonics from the Black Sea and Caucasus to the Arabian Platform. Geological Society, London, Special Publications; v. 340, p. 329-352.
[4]	Yilmaz A, Adamia Sh, Chabukiani A, Chkhotua T, Erdogan K, Tuzcu S, Karabiyikoglu M (2000). Structural correlation of the Southern Transcaucasus (Georgia) – Eastern Pontides (Turkey). In: Tectonics and magmatism in Turkey and the surrounding area. Geolog. Soc. London. Spec. publ. 173. P. 71-182.
[5]	Dixon C. J, Periere J (1974). Plate tectonics and mineralization in the tethyan region. Mineral. Deposita (Berlin). 9. P. 185-198.
[6]	Er Murat, Ozdogan Kemal, Tüysür Necatu. (1995). Geology and mineralization of Güzelayla porphyry Cu-Mo occurrence. Geology of the Black sea region. MTA Ankara. P. 226-231.
[7]	Mkrtchyan S. S, Karamyan K. A, Arevshatyan T. A (1969). Kadjaran copper-molybdenum deposit. Erevan: ArmSSR Acad. of Sciences publ. 269 p. (in Russian).
[8]	Doebrich J. L, Baba-Zade V, Kekelia S, Ramazanov V, Mamedov Z, Ismailova A, Abdulaeva Sh, Kekelia M, Kuloshvili S, Gagnidze N, Sadradze N. (2008). Geological-geophysical and geochemical models of ore-magmatic systems of Kedabek ore district copper-porphyry deposits. Proceedings of the Institute of Geology of Georgia, New series, 124 issue, p. 307-315.
[9]	Ratman I. P, Kekelia S. A, Narozauli I. G (1985). Zoning of porphyry copper-molybdenum deposits related to diorite-tonalite-plagiogranite complexes (as an example of the Tekhut deposit, Armenian SSR). All-Union Mineralogical Society Trans. Issue 3. P. 167-168. (in Russian).
[10]	Wood S. A, Crearer D. A, Borzik M. P (1987). Solubility of the assemblage pyrite-pyrrotite-magnetite-sphalerite-galena-gold-stibnite-bismuthinite-argenite-molybdenite in H₂O-NaCl-CO₂ solution from 200° to 350°C //Econ. geology. V. 82. P. 1864-1887.
[11]	Krivtsov A. I, Bogdanov Y. V, Borodaevskaia M. B et al. (1987). Copper deposits: types and formation conditions. Moscow: Nedra publ. 197 p. (in Russian).
[12]	Shipulin F. K, Rekharski V. I, Razbianskaia A. A, Pashkov Yu. N, Kapsamun V. P, Zvyagintsev L. I, Lante E. K, Kanstel A. V, Avetisyan G. G, Sukhorukov Yu. T (1975). Intrusions, hydrothermal-metasomatic formations and copper-molybdenum mineralization. Moscow: Nauka publ. 231 p. (in Russian).
[13]	Candella P. A, Holland N. D (1986). A mass transfer model for copper and molybdenum in magmatic hydrothermal systems: the origin of porphyry-tape ore deposits //Econ. Geol. V. 81. P. 1-19.
[14]	Barnam K. U (1983). Values of volatile components. In: H. S. Yoder (ed.). The evaluation of the igneous rocks. Moscow: Mir publ. P. 425-467 (in Russian).
[15]	Popov V. S (1988). Magmatic sources of ore matter in porphyry molybdenum and copper deposits. //Geology of ore deposits. N4. P. 8-47 (in Russian).
[16]	V. Baba-Zade, S. Kekelia, Sh. Abdulaeva, M. Kekelia. (2015). Orebearing sulfide deposits of paleoisland arc system, their metallogenic peculiarities and conditions of geodynamic development (on the example of Alpides and Lesser Caucasus). Baku. “CBS” publish. 400p. (in Russian)
[17]	Kekelia S, Kekelia M, Gagnidze N, Popkhadze N. (2017). Volcanogenic deposits of non-ferrous metals of paleo island-arc constructions and problems of ore genesis (on the example of ore districts of Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan and Turkey). Bulletin of the Kiev State University, #4 (79).
[18]	Kekelia S. A, Ambokadze A. H, Ratman J. P (1993). Volcanogenic deposits of non-ferrous metals of paleoisland-arc systems and methods of their prognosis. Tbilisi: Metsniereba publ. 96 p. (in Russian).
[19]	Kekelia S, Kekelia M, Otkhmezuri Z, Moon Ch, Ozgur N. (2004). Ore-forming systems in volcanogenic-sedimentary sequences, on the example of non-ferrous metal deposits of the Caucasus and Eastern Pontides. Bull. MTA, 129, p. 1-16.
[20]	Baba-Zade V, Kekelia S, Abdulaeva Sh, Kekelia M. (2020). Main features of The Caucasus metallogeny. Moscow, “Nedra”, 187 p. (in Russian)
[21]	Gugushvili V, Kekelia M, Moon Ch, Natsvlishvili M. (2002). Crustal and mantle sources of the Cretaceous volcanism and sulfide ore fprmation at Bolnisi orefield. // Bulletin of the National Academy of Sciences of Georgia. Vol. 117. P. 412-419.
[22]	Gablina I. F, Mozgova N. N, Borodaev Yu. S, Stepanova T. V, Cherkashev G. A, Iljin M. I (2000). Copper sulfide association in recent oceanic ores of the Logachev hydrothermal field (Mid, Ocenic ridge, 14°45’ N) //Geology of ore deposits. V.42. N4. P. 329-349. (in Russian).
[23]	Hannigton M. D., Peter J. M., Scott S. D. (1986). Gold in sea-floor polymetallic sulfide deposits. //Econ. geol. V. 81. P.1867-1883.
[24]	Elianova E. A. (1989). Formation of composition and structure of the ore at the modern and ancient VMS system. Soviet geology, 12, 17–26. [In Russian].
[25]	Grichuk D. V. (1999). Model of genesis of the sulfide ore body in the submarine hydrothermal system. In: Models of volcanogenic-sedimentary ore-bearing systems. Thesis of report. St. Petersburg. P.19-21. (in Russian).
[26]	Cherkashev G. A., Jirnov E. A., Stepanova T. V., Mozgova N. N. (1999). Zonality and model of for¬ma¬tion of the oceanic sulfide deposits. In:Models of volcanogenic-sedimentary of the ore-bearing systems. Thesis of report. St. Petersburg. P. 141-142 (in Russian).
[27]	Kekelia S, Kekelia M, Kuloshvili S, Razmadze A, Gagnidze N, Sadradze N, Yaroshevich V, Asatiani G, Doebrich J. L, Goldfarb R. J, Marsh E. E. (2008). Gold deposits of the Greater Caucasus, Georgia Republic: their genesis and prospecting criteria. "Ore Geology Reviews", Vol. 34, issue 3, p. 369-386.
[28]	Kekelia S, Kekelia M, Asatiani G, Gigiadze G, Shavishvili I. (2005). Gold potential of deposits of Georgia. Mining Journal, #6, p. 9-11.
[29]	Kekelia S, Kekelia M, Asatiani G, Gagnidze N, Popkhadze N, Kharazishvili G. (2016). Gold Potential of Georgia. Bulletin of the Georgian National Academy of Sciences, vol. 10, no. 4, Tbilisi. p. 41-49.
[30]	Nekrasov E. M (1988). Endogenous gold deposits of the world. Moscow: Nedra publ. 286 p. (in Russian).
[31]	Kekelia S, Kekelia M, Gagnidze N, Popkhadze N, Mshvenieradze I, Lonbjhanidze K, Kharazishvili G. (2017). Svaneti Gold Deposits (Kirar-Abakuri Ore Knot) and Their Genesis. Bulletin of the Georgian National Academy of Sciences. Vol. 11, № 2, p. 60-68.
[32]	Kekelia S, Kekelia M, Popkhadze N, Mshvenieradze I, Gagnidze N, Asatiani G, Lonbjhanidze K. (2017). Geological Settings and Genetic Model of the Zopkhito Prospect (southern slope of the Greater Caucasus, Georgia). Bulletin of the National Academy of Sciences of Georgia. Vol. 11, №4 P. 60-65.
[33]	Volkova I. B (1992). Organic petrology of metalliferous black slates–goals and objectives of study //Soviet geology. N7. P. 11-17 (in Russian).
[34]	McKeag S. A, Craw D, Norris R. J (1989). Origin and deposition of a graphite schist-hosted metamorphogenic Au-W deposit, Macraes, East Otago, New Zealand//Miner. deposita. V. 24. Issue 2, pp. 124-131.
[35]	Roedder E. (1983). Liquation of silicate magmas. In: Evolution of the igneous rocks. Moscow: Mir publ. P. 24-66 (in Russian).
[36]	Sokolov G. A, Grigoriew V. M (1974). Iron deposits. In:Ore deposits of the USSR. Moscow: Nedra Publ. P. 9-108.
[37]	Sinyakov V. I (1986). General ore genesis models for endogenous deposits. Novosiirsk: Nauka publ. 243 p. (in Russian).
[38]	Kalinin D. V (1969). Experimental investigations of physical-chemical conditions of the scarn processes. Novosibirsk: Nauka publ. 175 p. (in Russian).
[39]	Einaudi M. T, Meinert L. D, Newberry R. D (1984). Scarn deposits. In: Genesis of ore deposits. Moscow: Mir publ. P. 401-515 (in Russian).
[40]	Betechtin A. G (1946). Industrial manganese deposits of the USSR. Moscow-Leningrad. AN USSR. 135 p. (in Russian).
[41]	Makharadze A. I, Chkheidze R. G (1971). Lithology of oligocene deposits Kvirila depression. KYMS. Tbilisi. P. 177-188. (in Russian).
[42]	Stolyarov A. S (1993). Genesis of the phanerozoic manganese deposits //Otechestvennaya geologia. N5. P 28-33 (in Russian).
[43]	Titley S. R, Beane R. E (1984). Porphyry copper deposits. In: Genesis of ore deposits. V. 1. Moscow: Mir publ. P. 245-333 (in Russian).
[44]	Baba-Zade V, Kekelia S, Abdulaeva Sh, Kekelia M. (2017). Ore deposits of the central part of Alpine mountain-fold belt and problems of their genesis (Greater and Lesser Caucasus, Eastern Pontides). Baku, “CBS”. 288 p. (in Russian).
[45]	Zvezdov V. S, Migachov I. F, Grifonov M. M, Zairi N. M (1989). Formation environments for porphyry copper ore-magmatic systems //Geology of ore deposits. N4. P. 23-37 (in Russian).
[46]	Krivtsov A. I (1989). Applied metallogeny. Moscow: Nedra publ. 288 p. (in Russian).
[47]	Taylor H. P (1982). Oxygen and hydrogen isotopes in hydrothermal deposits. In: Geochemistry of hydrothermal ore deposits. Moscow: Mir publ. P. 200-237 (in Russian).
[48]	Korzhinski D. C. (1982). Theory of metasomatic zonality. Moscow, Nauka, 104 p. (in Russian).
[49]	Mottl, M. J, Holland, H. D, Corr, R. F. (1979). Chemical exchange during hydrothermal alteration of basalts seawater. Experimental results for Fe, Mn and sulfur apecies. Geochim et acta, 43, 869–884.
[50]	Prokoptsev G. N, Prokoptsev N. G (1990). Formation of metalliferous hydrotherms at oceanic floor. USSR Acad. of Sciences Trans. Geol. ser. N4. P. 34-44. (in Russian).
[51]	Akimtsev V. A, Shorapov V. N (1993). “Ore-bearing” effusives of the side at the rift valley of the Mid Atlantic Ridge //Russia Academy of Sciences Bull. 331. N 3. P. 329-331 (in Russian).
[52]	Matsukama T, Khorikosi E (1973). A review of Kuroko deposits in Japan. In: Volcanism and ore formation. Moscow: Mir publ. P. 129-151. (in Russian).
[53]	Franklin J. M, Lydon J. W, Sangster D. F (1984). Base metal massive sulfide deposits of volcanogenic affinities. In: Genesis of ore deposits. V. 2. Moskow: Mir publ. P. 39-252 (in Russian).
[54]	Ovchinnikov L. N. (1988). Formation of ore deposits. Moscow: Nedra publ. 255 p. (in Russian).
[55]	Yaroshevich V. Z. (1985). Genetic features of ore formations of the Caucasus according to the isotope studies. Abstract of Candidate thesis. – Tbilisi: Metsniereba, 52 р. [In Russian].
[56]	de Ronde C. E. J, Faure K, Bray C. J, Chappell D. A, Ian C. Wright I. C. (2003). Hydrothermal fluids associated with seafloor mineralization at two southern Kermadec arc volcanoes, offshore New Zeland. Mineralium Deposita, 38, p. 217-233.
[57]	Letnikov F. A (1997). Processes of self-organization during formation of magmatic and hydrothermal deposits//Geology of ore deposits. N4. P. 307-322 (in Russian).
[58]	Kholodov V. N, Nedumov R. J (1991). Geochemical criteria for hydrogen sulfide contamination of ancient water bodies. AS USSR. Geol. ser. N 12. P. 74-82 (in Russian).

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Sergo Kekelia, Nona Gagnidze, Ira Mshvenieradze, Giorgi Kharazishvili. (2021). Ore Mineralization of Active Paleomargins of Continents (on the Example of Alpine Metallic Deposits of Caucasus and Pontides). Journal of Energy and Natural Resources, 10(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jenr.20211001.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Sergo Kekelia; Nona Gagnidze; Ira Mshvenieradze; Giorgi Kharazishvili. Ore Mineralization of Active Paleomargins of Continents (on the Example of Alpine Metallic Deposits of Caucasus and Pontides). J. Energy Nat. Resour. 2021, 10(1), 1-13. doi: 10.11648/j.jenr.20211001.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Sergo Kekelia, Nona Gagnidze, Ira Mshvenieradze, Giorgi Kharazishvili. Ore Mineralization of Active Paleomargins of Continents (on the Example of Alpine Metallic Deposits of Caucasus and Pontides). J Energy Nat Resour. 2021;10(1):1-13. doi: 10.11648/j.jenr.20211001.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.jenr.20211001.11,
  author = {Sergo Kekelia and Nona Gagnidze and Ira Mshvenieradze and Giorgi Kharazishvili},
  title = {Ore Mineralization of Active Paleomargins of Continents (on the Example of Alpine Metallic Deposits of Caucasus and Pontides)},
  journal = {Journal of Energy and Natural Resources},
  volume = {10},
  number = {1},
  pages = {1-13},
  doi = {10.11648/j.jenr.20211001.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jenr.20211001.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jenr.20211001.11},
  abstract = {Metallogenic features of Pontides – Lesser Caucasus microplates (part of active paleomargin of Eurasian microplate are determined by copper, copper-molibdenium porphyry, iron-scarn, volcanic nonferrous, precious metals, auriferous and manganese ore deposits. Their orebearing fluid systems occurred consistently on various stages of development of the region and were correlated with geological processes on the border of convergental and divergental interaction of mic¬roplates. The above mentioned types of ore deposits display clear areal and temporary bonds with certain composites of lithogeodynamic complexes (which are presented in mountain folding systems of relics of ancient geomorphological structures) - geological formations. Different geologic-genetical models are suggested for each type of deposits, characterizing possible sources of ore substance, causes of rise and functions of fluid systems, in addition to ore formation environment. It may be said that different genetic groups of deposits are regularly associated with certain litho-geodynamic complexes. The complexes of the paleomarginal sea hollows of the divergent type are specialized in copper and pyrite-polimetallic hydrothermal-sedimentary mineralization; island arc systems of different age – in copper and copper-zinc hydrothermal-sedimentary and epigenetic mineralization; their uplifted blocks – in gold, copper-porphyry and skarn-iron-ore mineralization. Within the area of volcanic-sedimentary copper-zinc deposits in intra-arc sea hollows (Pontides) manganese accumulations are sometimes encountered.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Ore Mineralization of Active Paleomargins of Continents (on the Example of Alpine Metallic Deposits of Caucasus and Pontides)
AU  - Sergo Kekelia
AU  - Nona Gagnidze
AU  - Ira Mshvenieradze
AU  - Giorgi Kharazishvili
Y1  - 2021/02/23
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jenr.20211001.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.jenr.20211001.11
T2  - Journal of Energy and Natural Resources
JF  - Journal of Energy and Natural Resources
JO  - Journal of Energy and Natural Resources
SP  - 1
EP  - 13
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-7404
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jenr.20211001.11
AB  - Metallogenic features of Pontides – Lesser Caucasus microplates (part of active paleomargin of Eurasian microplate are determined by copper, copper-molibdenium porphyry, iron-scarn, volcanic nonferrous, precious metals, auriferous and manganese ore deposits. Their orebearing fluid systems occurred consistently on various stages of development of the region and were correlated with geological processes on the border of convergental and divergental interaction of mic¬roplates. The above mentioned types of ore deposits display clear areal and temporary bonds with certain composites of lithogeodynamic complexes (which are presented in mountain folding systems of relics of ancient geomorphological structures) - geological formations. Different geologic-genetical models are suggested for each type of deposits, characterizing possible sources of ore substance, causes of rise and functions of fluid systems, in addition to ore formation environment. It may be said that different genetic groups of deposits are regularly associated with certain litho-geodynamic complexes. The complexes of the paleomarginal sea hollows of the divergent type are specialized in copper and pyrite-polimetallic hydrothermal-sedimentary mineralization; island arc systems of different age – in copper and copper-zinc hydrothermal-sedimentary and epigenetic mineralization; their uplifted blocks – in gold, copper-porphyry and skarn-iron-ore mineralization. Within the area of volcanic-sedimentary copper-zinc deposits in intra-arc sea hollows (Pontides) manganese accumulations are sometimes encountered.
VL  - 10
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Sergo Kekelia

Department of Geochemistry and Mineral Resources, Al. Janelidze Institute of Geology, Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia
Nona Gagnidze

Department of Geochemistry and Mineral Resources, Al. Janelidze Institute of Geology, Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia
Ira Mshvenieradze

Department of Geochemistry and Mineral Resources, Al. Janelidze Institute of Geology, Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia
Giorgi Kharazishvili

Department of Geochemistry and Mineral Resources, Al. Janelidze Institute of Geology, Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Sergo Kekelia, Nona Gagnidze, Ira Mshvenieradze, Giorgi Kharazishvili. (2021). Ore Mineralization of Active Paleomargins of Continents (on the Example of Alpine Metallic Deposits of Caucasus and Pontides). Journal of Energy and Natural Resources, 10(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jenr.20211001.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Sergo Kekelia; Nona Gagnidze; Ira Mshvenieradze; Giorgi Kharazishvili. Ore Mineralization of Active Paleomargins of Continents (on the Example of Alpine Metallic Deposits of Caucasus and Pontides). J. Energy Nat. Resour. 2021, 10(1), 1-13. doi: 10.11648/j.jenr.20211001.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Sergo Kekelia, Nona Gagnidze, Ira Mshvenieradze, Giorgi Kharazishvili. Ore Mineralization of Active Paleomargins of Continents (on the Example of Alpine Metallic Deposits of Caucasus and Pontides). J Energy Nat Resour. 2021;10(1):1-13. doi: 10.11648/j.jenr.20211001.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.jenr.20211001.11,
  author = {Sergo Kekelia and Nona Gagnidze and Ira Mshvenieradze and Giorgi Kharazishvili},
  title = {Ore Mineralization of Active Paleomargins of Continents (on the Example of Alpine Metallic Deposits of Caucasus and Pontides)},
  journal = {Journal of Energy and Natural Resources},
  volume = {10},
  number = {1},
  pages = {1-13},
  doi = {10.11648/j.jenr.20211001.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jenr.20211001.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jenr.20211001.11},
  abstract = {Metallogenic features of Pontides – Lesser Caucasus microplates (part of active paleomargin of Eurasian microplate are determined by copper, copper-molibdenium porphyry, iron-scarn, volcanic nonferrous, precious metals, auriferous and manganese ore deposits. Their orebearing fluid systems occurred consistently on various stages of development of the region and were correlated with geological processes on the border of convergental and divergental interaction of mic¬roplates. The above mentioned types of ore deposits display clear areal and temporary bonds with certain composites of lithogeodynamic complexes (which are presented in mountain folding systems of relics of ancient geomorphological structures) - geological formations. Different geologic-genetical models are suggested for each type of deposits, characterizing possible sources of ore substance, causes of rise and functions of fluid systems, in addition to ore formation environment. It may be said that different genetic groups of deposits are regularly associated with certain litho-geodynamic complexes. The complexes of the paleomarginal sea hollows of the divergent type are specialized in copper and pyrite-polimetallic hydrothermal-sedimentary mineralization; island arc systems of different age – in copper and copper-zinc hydrothermal-sedimentary and epigenetic mineralization; their uplifted blocks – in gold, copper-porphyry and skarn-iron-ore mineralization. Within the area of volcanic-sedimentary copper-zinc deposits in intra-arc sea hollows (Pontides) manganese accumulations are sometimes encountered.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Ore Mineralization of Active Paleomargins of Continents (on the Example of Alpine Metallic Deposits of Caucasus and Pontides)
AU  - Sergo Kekelia
AU  - Nona Gagnidze
AU  - Ira Mshvenieradze
AU  - Giorgi Kharazishvili
Y1  - 2021/02/23
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jenr.20211001.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.jenr.20211001.11
T2  - Journal of Energy and Natural Resources
JF  - Journal of Energy and Natural Resources
JO  - Journal of Energy and Natural Resources
SP  - 1
EP  - 13
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-7404
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jenr.20211001.11
AB  - Metallogenic features of Pontides – Lesser Caucasus microplates (part of active paleomargin of Eurasian microplate are determined by copper, copper-molibdenium porphyry, iron-scarn, volcanic nonferrous, precious metals, auriferous and manganese ore deposits. Their orebearing fluid systems occurred consistently on various stages of development of the region and were correlated with geological processes on the border of convergental and divergental interaction of mic¬roplates. The above mentioned types of ore deposits display clear areal and temporary bonds with certain composites of lithogeodynamic complexes (which are presented in mountain folding systems of relics of ancient geomorphological structures) - geological formations. Different geologic-genetical models are suggested for each type of deposits, characterizing possible sources of ore substance, causes of rise and functions of fluid systems, in addition to ore formation environment. It may be said that different genetic groups of deposits are regularly associated with certain litho-geodynamic complexes. The complexes of the paleomarginal sea hollows of the divergent type are specialized in copper and pyrite-polimetallic hydrothermal-sedimentary mineralization; island arc systems of different age – in copper and copper-zinc hydrothermal-sedimentary and epigenetic mineralization; their uplifted blocks – in gold, copper-porphyry and skarn-iron-ore mineralization. Within the area of volcanic-sedimentary copper-zinc deposits in intra-arc sea hollows (Pontides) manganese accumulations are sometimes encountered.
VL  - 10
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download