This study was undertaken to identify the longitudinal dynamic characteristics of the Box-Wing Aircraft. Research on the Box Wing aircraft gained traction following increasing demand for an environmental friendly aircraft that would reduce noise and pollutant emissions. The Box-Wing Aircraft is renowned for its potential aerodynamics advantages over conventional aircraft. However, due to its departure from conventional configuration, the stability dynamics of the Box Wing has not been fully explored. This study investigates the longitudinal dynamic stability characteristics of a Box Wing Aircraft at the conceptual design level using the J2 Aircraft Dynamics Software. The study integrates empirical mass estimation methods and aerodynamic data generated from a vortex lattice tool into J2 Aircraft Dynamics Software Suite. This was done to assess the Short Period Oscillation and Phugoid responses of a Box Wing Aircraft and a conventional cantilever wing aircraft. For a 2s step input, the short period oscillation induced on the Box Wing was damped out after 19s resulting in damping ratio of 0.68 and the undamped natural frequency is 1.8 rad/s. In the Phugoid mode, the Box Wing Aircraft gives a damping ratio of 0.006 and undamped natural frequency of 0.07 rad/s. On the other hand, the SPO induced on the reference conventional aircraft settles after 14s producing a damping ratio of 0.76 and undamped natural frequency of 3.12 rad/s. The damping ratio and undamped natural frequency for the Phugoid mode of the reference conventional aircraft were however 0.001 and 0.07 rad/s respectively. These results indicate that the reference conventional cantilever wing aircraft possesses acceptable longitudinal dynamic stability characteristics while the Box Wing Aircraft would require stability augmentation systems to improve its flying and handling qualities.
Published in | International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Applications (Volume 9, Issue 5) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijmea.20210905.12 |
Page(s) | 79-84 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Longitudinal, Dynamics, Stability, Box-Wing
[1] | J. Jeffery: “J2 Universal Aircraft Dynamics Software Suite.” J2 Aircraft Dynamics Ltd, (2010). |
[2] | P. O Jemitola: Conceptual Design and Optimisation Methodology for Box Wing Aircraft, School of Aerospace Engineering, Department of Aerospace Engineering, Cranfield University, Cranfield, (2012). |
[3] | L. Jenkinson, D. Rhodes and P. Simpkin: Civil Jet Aircraft Design. Arnold Publishers, UK, (1999). |
[4] | P. O. Jemitola, J. Fielding and G. Monterzino: ‘Wing Mass Estimation Algorithm for Medium Range Box Wing Aircraft’, Aeronautical Journal, (2013). |
[5] | L. Jenkinson and J. F. Marchman: Aircraft Design Projects for Engineering Students, Oxford, UK: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann and AIAA, (2003). |
[6] | C. Matthews: Aeronautical Engineers Data Book, Oxford, UK: Elsevier Butterworth Heinemann, (2002). |
[7] | E. Bruhn: Analysis and Design of Flight Vehicle Structures. Indianapolis, USA: SR Jacobs and Associates, (1973). |
[8] | J. Roskam: Airplane Design: Part VI - Preliminary Calculation of Aerodynamic, Thrust and Power Characteristics. Roskam Aviation and Engineering Corporation, Kansas, USA, (1990). |
[9] | ESDU: “Rate of change of lift coefficient with control deflection for full-span plain controls,” Tech. Rep. 74011, The Royal Aeronautical Society, March (1974). |
[10] | ESDU: “Installed tailplane lift-curve slope at subsonic speeds,” Tech. Rep. 89029, The Royal Aeronautical Society, October (1989). |
[11] | M. Hepperle: “Javafoil version 2.20 - 01.” http://www.mhaerotools.de/airfoils/javafoil.htm, December 2011. Accessed March (2010). |
[12] | T. R. Yechout, T. D. Bossert and S. Morris: Introduction to aircraft flight mechanics: perfor- mance, static stability, dynamic stability and classical feedback control, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Virginia, USA, (2003). |
[13] | M. Cook: Flight Dynamics Principles, Elsevier Ltd, Oxford, UK, second edition ed., (2007). |
[14] | Scholz, R and Caja, D. Box Wing Flight Dynamics in the Stage of Conceptual Aircraft Design. Hamburg University of Applied Sciences Aero – Aircraft Design and Systems Group, Deutscher Luftund Raumfahrtkongress 2012. |
[15] | Urso, D and Martinez-val, R. Flight Dynamics of Flying Wings. 26th International Congress of the Aeronautical Science, ICAS 2008. |
APA Style
Paul Olugbeji Jemitola, Paul Peter Okonkwo. (2021). An Investigation of the Longitudinal Dynamic Stability of a Box-Wing Aircraft. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Applications, 9(5), 79-84. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmea.20210905.12
ACS Style
Paul Olugbeji Jemitola; Paul Peter Okonkwo. An Investigation of the Longitudinal Dynamic Stability of a Box-Wing Aircraft. Int. J. Mech. Eng. Appl. 2021, 9(5), 79-84. doi: 10.11648/j.ijmea.20210905.12
AMA Style
Paul Olugbeji Jemitola, Paul Peter Okonkwo. An Investigation of the Longitudinal Dynamic Stability of a Box-Wing Aircraft. Int J Mech Eng Appl. 2021;9(5):79-84. doi: 10.11648/j.ijmea.20210905.12
@article{10.11648/j.ijmea.20210905.12, author = {Paul Olugbeji Jemitola and Paul Peter Okonkwo}, title = {An Investigation of the Longitudinal Dynamic Stability of a Box-Wing Aircraft}, journal = {International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Applications}, volume = {9}, number = {5}, pages = {79-84}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijmea.20210905.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmea.20210905.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijmea.20210905.12}, abstract = {This study was undertaken to identify the longitudinal dynamic characteristics of the Box-Wing Aircraft. Research on the Box Wing aircraft gained traction following increasing demand for an environmental friendly aircraft that would reduce noise and pollutant emissions. The Box-Wing Aircraft is renowned for its potential aerodynamics advantages over conventional aircraft. However, due to its departure from conventional configuration, the stability dynamics of the Box Wing has not been fully explored. This study investigates the longitudinal dynamic stability characteristics of a Box Wing Aircraft at the conceptual design level using the J2 Aircraft Dynamics Software. The study integrates empirical mass estimation methods and aerodynamic data generated from a vortex lattice tool into J2 Aircraft Dynamics Software Suite. This was done to assess the Short Period Oscillation and Phugoid responses of a Box Wing Aircraft and a conventional cantilever wing aircraft. For a 2s step input, the short period oscillation induced on the Box Wing was damped out after 19s resulting in damping ratio of 0.68 and the undamped natural frequency is 1.8 rad/s. In the Phugoid mode, the Box Wing Aircraft gives a damping ratio of 0.006 and undamped natural frequency of 0.07 rad/s. On the other hand, the SPO induced on the reference conventional aircraft settles after 14s producing a damping ratio of 0.76 and undamped natural frequency of 3.12 rad/s. The damping ratio and undamped natural frequency for the Phugoid mode of the reference conventional aircraft were however 0.001 and 0.07 rad/s respectively. These results indicate that the reference conventional cantilever wing aircraft possesses acceptable longitudinal dynamic stability characteristics while the Box Wing Aircraft would require stability augmentation systems to improve its flying and handling qualities.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - An Investigation of the Longitudinal Dynamic Stability of a Box-Wing Aircraft AU - Paul Olugbeji Jemitola AU - Paul Peter Okonkwo Y1 - 2021/11/27 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmea.20210905.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ijmea.20210905.12 T2 - International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Applications JF - International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Applications JO - International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Applications SP - 79 EP - 84 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-0248 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmea.20210905.12 AB - This study was undertaken to identify the longitudinal dynamic characteristics of the Box-Wing Aircraft. Research on the Box Wing aircraft gained traction following increasing demand for an environmental friendly aircraft that would reduce noise and pollutant emissions. The Box-Wing Aircraft is renowned for its potential aerodynamics advantages over conventional aircraft. However, due to its departure from conventional configuration, the stability dynamics of the Box Wing has not been fully explored. This study investigates the longitudinal dynamic stability characteristics of a Box Wing Aircraft at the conceptual design level using the J2 Aircraft Dynamics Software. The study integrates empirical mass estimation methods and aerodynamic data generated from a vortex lattice tool into J2 Aircraft Dynamics Software Suite. This was done to assess the Short Period Oscillation and Phugoid responses of a Box Wing Aircraft and a conventional cantilever wing aircraft. For a 2s step input, the short period oscillation induced on the Box Wing was damped out after 19s resulting in damping ratio of 0.68 and the undamped natural frequency is 1.8 rad/s. In the Phugoid mode, the Box Wing Aircraft gives a damping ratio of 0.006 and undamped natural frequency of 0.07 rad/s. On the other hand, the SPO induced on the reference conventional aircraft settles after 14s producing a damping ratio of 0.76 and undamped natural frequency of 3.12 rad/s. The damping ratio and undamped natural frequency for the Phugoid mode of the reference conventional aircraft were however 0.001 and 0.07 rad/s respectively. These results indicate that the reference conventional cantilever wing aircraft possesses acceptable longitudinal dynamic stability characteristics while the Box Wing Aircraft would require stability augmentation systems to improve its flying and handling qualities. VL - 9 IS - 5 ER -