Recently voltage sags have gradually become one of the most important power quality problems with the large scale use of sensitive electrical equipment. Analysis of varied attributes causing voltage sags can not only guide the planning, equipment selection, operation and maintenance of power supply engineering, but also can provide a theoretical basis for effectively assessing the risks and severity of the power quality incidents. It is meaningful to combine the existing problems of technology and management level to get the assessment results of the voltage sags. In this paper, clustering analysis and evaluation method are proposed for multi-cause attributes that affect voltage sags. The calculation method of the voltage on the multiple fault location parameters in the power grid is derived. The evaluation method of the voltage sags considering the user’s tolerance level is given. The characteristic properties of causes are used as parameters to describe disturbances which provide a basis for voltage sag evaluation. Then the equipment compatibility index is introduced, the analytic hierarchy process is used to determine the weight of the voltage sag evaluation index, and the severity of the voltage sag of each node of the distribution network is calculated to realize the distribution network voltage sag severity assessment. Finally, the voltage sag under multi causal attributes is analyzed using the equipment compatibility index as the standard, and the sag severity of the equipment is analyzed. The multi-factor attributes contribution degree proposed in this paper takes the equipment compatibility as the index, and can accurately reflect the impact of various attributes on equipment after voltage sags.
Published in | International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering (Volume 10, Issue 6) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijepe.20211006.16 |
Page(s) | 135-140 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Voltage Sags, Evaluation, Analytic Hierarchy Process, Equipment Compatibility Index
[1] | Liu Jiahan, Chen Kexu, Ma Jian, et al. Classification of three-phase voltage dips based on CNN and random forest [J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2019, 47 (20): 112-118. |
[2] | Tan H G R, Ramachandaramurthy V K. Voltage sag acceptability assessment using multiple magnitude- duration function [J] IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2012, 27 (4): 1984-1990. |
[3] | Wang Ying, Wang Huan, Wang Xin. A method of voltage sag source identification based on improved grey relational analysis [J]. Electrical Measurement & Instrumentation, 2020, 57 (15): 1-7. |
[4] | Chen Zhongli, Xu Weisheng. The cause of voltage interruption and voltage sag and the prevention and control of the voltage. Journal of Electrical Technology, 2015, 30 (1): 518-520. |
[5] | Liu Yang, Xiao Xianyong, Zhang Xiaoping, et al. Multiobjective optimal STATCOM allocation for voltage sag mitigation [J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2020, 35 (3): 1410-1422. |
[6] | Ye Xi, Liu Kaipei, Li Zhiwei. Voltage sag frequency assessment considering action characteristics of line protection in uncertain conditions [J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2018, 38 (3): 169-176. |
[7] | Lu Wenqing, Chang Qiankun, Jia Dongqiang, et al. Research on evaluation methods of voltage sag severity for equipment side [J]. Electric Power System Equipment, 2019, 39 (1): 181-188. |
[8] | Lin Yi, Wu Danyue, Zhang Xuemeng, et al. Discussion on the voltage sag indicator. Power System Protection and Control, 2010, 38 (3): 147-152. |
[9] | Chan J Y Milanovic J V. Severity Indices for Assessment of Equipment Sensitivity to Voltage Sags and Short Interruptions [A]. In: IEEE Power Engineering Socity General Meeting [C]. 2007. 1-7. |
[10] | Liao H, Abdelrahman S, Guo Y, et al. Identification of weak areas of power network based on exposure to voltage sags—part I: development of sag severity index for single-event characterization [J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2015, 30 (6): 2392-2400. |
[11] | Jia Qingquan, Ai Li, Dong Haiyan, Shi Leilei, et al. The voltage sag incompatibility and impact evaluation indicators and methods considering uncertainty [J]. Journal of Electrical Technology, 2017, 32 (01): 48-57. |
[12] | Zhang Bingjiang. Hierarchical analysis and its application case. Beijing: Electronic Industry Press, 2014. |
[13] | Yan Lin, Fang Lin, Daoshan Huang, et al. Voltage sag severity analysis based on improved FP-Growth algorithm and AHP algorithm [J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021, 1732 (1): 012088. |
[14] | Hiyama T, Hirowatari T. Long term monitoring of voltage sags at 6.6 kV distribution substation [C] //International Conference on Power System Technology 2000, Perth, Australia: IEEE, 2000: 995-1000. |
[15] | Gahrooyi Y R, Golkar M A. Voltage sag estimation in radial distribution systems with limited monitoring points [C]//International Conference on Electrical Engineering 2007, Lahore, Pakistan: IEEE, 2007: 1-4. |
[16] | Wang Bin, Pan Zhencun, Xu Wenyuan. Estimation analysis of voltage sag amplitude of distribution systems. China Journal of Electrical Engineering, 2005, 25 (13): 29-34. |
[17] | Asha K S, Jaya L A. Data mining for classification of power quality problems using WEKA and the effect of attributes on classification accuracy [J]. Protection and Control of Modern Power Systems, 2018, 3 (3): 303-314. |
[18] | Park C H, Jang G. Systematic method to identify an area of vulnerability to voltage sags [J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2017, 32 (3): 1583-1591. |
[19] | Matinez J A, Martin-Arnedo J. Voltage sag studies in distribution networks, part III: voltage sag index calculation [J]. IEEE Trans. On Power Delivery, 2006, 21 (3): 1689-1697. |
[20] | Qu Shuo, Huang Chun, Jiang Yaqun, et al. A new detection method of voltage sag applied in DVR [J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2013, 28 (4): 234-239. |
[21] | Milanovic J V, Myo T A, Gupta C P. The influence of fault distribution on stochastic prediction of voltage sags [J]. IEEE Trans. on Power Delivery, 2005, 20 (1): 278-285. |
[22] | Moschakis N M, Hatziargyriou N D. Analytical calculation and stochastic assessment of voltage sags [J]. IEEE Trans. on Power Delivery, 2006, 21 (3): 1727-1734. |
[23] | Huilian L, Milanovic J V, Marcos R, et al. Voltage sag estimation in sparsely monitored power systems based on deep learning and system area mapping [J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2018, 33 (6): 3162-3172. |
[24] | Elisa E J, Araceli H. An analytical approach for stochastic assessment of balanced and unbalanced voltage sags in large system [J]. IEEE Trans. On Power Delivery, 2006, 21 (3): 1493-1500. |
[25] | Xiao Xianyong, Chen Weidong, Yang Honggeng, et al. The voltage sag frequency assessment measured by the number of user satisfaction intervals. China Journal of Electrical Engineering, 2010, 30 (16): 104-110. |
[26] | Park C H, Hong J H, Jang G. Assessment of system voltage sag performance based on the concept of area of severity [J]. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, 2010, 4 (6): 683-693. |
[27] | Wang Dongxu, Le Jian, Liu Kaipei, et al. Voltage sag analysis under multiple fault conditions of complex power grids. China Journal of Electrical Engineering, 2012, 32 (7); 101-106. |
APA Style
Yunxia Dong. (2021). Evaluation Method of Voltage Sag Severity in Distribution Networks. International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering, 10(6), 135-140. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepe.20211006.16
ACS Style
Yunxia Dong. Evaluation Method of Voltage Sag Severity in Distribution Networks. Int. J. Energy Power Eng. 2021, 10(6), 135-140. doi: 10.11648/j.ijepe.20211006.16
AMA Style
Yunxia Dong. Evaluation Method of Voltage Sag Severity in Distribution Networks. Int J Energy Power Eng. 2021;10(6):135-140. doi: 10.11648/j.ijepe.20211006.16
@article{10.11648/j.ijepe.20211006.16, author = {Yunxia Dong}, title = {Evaluation Method of Voltage Sag Severity in Distribution Networks}, journal = {International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering}, volume = {10}, number = {6}, pages = {135-140}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijepe.20211006.16}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepe.20211006.16}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijepe.20211006.16}, abstract = {Recently voltage sags have gradually become one of the most important power quality problems with the large scale use of sensitive electrical equipment. Analysis of varied attributes causing voltage sags can not only guide the planning, equipment selection, operation and maintenance of power supply engineering, but also can provide a theoretical basis for effectively assessing the risks and severity of the power quality incidents. It is meaningful to combine the existing problems of technology and management level to get the assessment results of the voltage sags. In this paper, clustering analysis and evaluation method are proposed for multi-cause attributes that affect voltage sags. The calculation method of the voltage on the multiple fault location parameters in the power grid is derived. The evaluation method of the voltage sags considering the user’s tolerance level is given. The characteristic properties of causes are used as parameters to describe disturbances which provide a basis for voltage sag evaluation. Then the equipment compatibility index is introduced, the analytic hierarchy process is used to determine the weight of the voltage sag evaluation index, and the severity of the voltage sag of each node of the distribution network is calculated to realize the distribution network voltage sag severity assessment. Finally, the voltage sag under multi causal attributes is analyzed using the equipment compatibility index as the standard, and the sag severity of the equipment is analyzed. The multi-factor attributes contribution degree proposed in this paper takes the equipment compatibility as the index, and can accurately reflect the impact of various attributes on equipment after voltage sags.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Evaluation Method of Voltage Sag Severity in Distribution Networks AU - Yunxia Dong Y1 - 2021/12/07 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepe.20211006.16 DO - 10.11648/j.ijepe.20211006.16 T2 - International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering JF - International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering JO - International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering SP - 135 EP - 140 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2326-960X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepe.20211006.16 AB - Recently voltage sags have gradually become one of the most important power quality problems with the large scale use of sensitive electrical equipment. Analysis of varied attributes causing voltage sags can not only guide the planning, equipment selection, operation and maintenance of power supply engineering, but also can provide a theoretical basis for effectively assessing the risks and severity of the power quality incidents. It is meaningful to combine the existing problems of technology and management level to get the assessment results of the voltage sags. In this paper, clustering analysis and evaluation method are proposed for multi-cause attributes that affect voltage sags. The calculation method of the voltage on the multiple fault location parameters in the power grid is derived. The evaluation method of the voltage sags considering the user’s tolerance level is given. The characteristic properties of causes are used as parameters to describe disturbances which provide a basis for voltage sag evaluation. Then the equipment compatibility index is introduced, the analytic hierarchy process is used to determine the weight of the voltage sag evaluation index, and the severity of the voltage sag of each node of the distribution network is calculated to realize the distribution network voltage sag severity assessment. Finally, the voltage sag under multi causal attributes is analyzed using the equipment compatibility index as the standard, and the sag severity of the equipment is analyzed. The multi-factor attributes contribution degree proposed in this paper takes the equipment compatibility as the index, and can accurately reflect the impact of various attributes on equipment after voltage sags. VL - 10 IS - 6 ER -