Numerous interactions between plants and animals vary in their outcome between predation and mutualism. Depending on the costs and benefits, the relationship is placed at one end of the scale or the other. A thin line separates both interactions. Acorn consumption by rodent species has been considered a predation relationship. Rodents consume acorns, which is a cost to oaks species as they are prevented from colonizing new places. The aim of this study is to show that part of the costs allocated to depredation due to loss of acorns cannot be allocated to costs. Some attacked acorns are partially consumed, but preserve their embryo and are not lost as they can germinate. This behavior, preserving the embryo, is observed in certain species. We will attempt to verify whether the behavior of conserving the embryo shown by some rodent species during partial consumption of acorns is intended to bring their relationship with oaks species closer to mutualism. To do this, we studied and compared the behavior of two acorns-consuming rodent species (Apodemus sylvaticus and Mus spretus) with another species that has never used this type of resources (Microtus arvalis), during acorns consumption. The results show that only two acorn-consuming species preserved the embryo, and not by species that are incorporating acorns into their diet. Species that have consumed acorns since ancient times show embryo-acorns preserving behavior. These species (Apodemus sylvaticus and Mus spretus) start consuming the acorns at the basal part, away from the embryo, at a higher energy expense, but they assume it because the mutualistic relationship they seek provides them with food guarantees in the future. This behavior is the contribution made by mutualistic rodents to maintain their relationship with oaks plants within the term of mutualism. Both species benefit from the relationship. Plants seeds are successfully transported to and germinated in suitable places and rodents obtain nutrients and the possibility of providing their offspring with future resources. The species not using acorns as food (Microtus arvalis) behaves as a predatory. The most convenient way for it to open the acorn is to devour the embryo, thus posing a threat to oak species.
Published in | Ecology and Evolutionary Biology (Volume 7, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.eeb.20220701.11 |
Page(s) | 1-6 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Rodents, Oaks, Acorns, Mutualism, Behavior, Partial Consumption, Preserve Embryo
[1] | Bartlow AW, Agosta S J, Curtis R, Yi X, Steele MA (2018a) Acorn size and tolerance to seed predators: The multiple roles of acorns as food for seed predators, fruit for dispersal and fuel for growth. Integrat Zool 13: 248–263. |
[2] | Bartlow AW, Lichti NI, Curtis R, Swihart RK, Steele MA (2018b) Re-caching of acorns by rodents: Cache management in eastern deciduous forests of North America. Act Oecol 92: 117–122. |
[3] | Beck MJ, Vander Wall SB (2010) Seed dispersal by scatter-hoarding rodents in arid environments. J Ecol 98: 1300–1309. |
[4] | Bogdziewicz M, Crone E E, Zwolak R (2020) Do benefits of seed dispersal and caching by scatterhoarders outweigh the costs of predation? An example with oaks and yellow-necked mice. J Ecol. 108: 1009–1018. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.13307. |
[5] | Cao L, Yan C, Wang B (2018) Differential seed mass selection on hoarding decisions among three sympatric rodents. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 72: 161 doi.org/10.1007/s00265-018-2576-5. |
[6] | Chang G, Zhang Z (2014) Functional traits determine formation of mutualism and predation interactions in seed-rodent dispersal system of a subtropical forest. Act Oecol 55: 43-50. |
[7] | Del Arco J. M., Beltrán D., Martínez-Ruiz C. (2018). Risk for the natural regeneration of Quercus species due to the expansion of rodent species (Microtus arvalis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 72: 160. doi.org/10.1007/s00265-018-2575-6. |
[8] | Galetti M, Guevara R, Galbiati LA, Neves CL, Rodarte RR, Mendes CP (2015) Seed Predation by Rodents and Implications for Plant Recruitment in Defaunated Atlantic Forests. Biotropica 47: 521–525. |
[9] | Gleditsch J M, Hruska A M, Foster J T (2017) Connecting Resource Tracking by Frugivores to Temporal Variation in Seed Dispersal Networks. Ecol. Evol 22 https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2017.00098 |
[10] | Gómez J M, Schupp E W, Jordano P (2019) Synzoochory: the ecological and evolutionary relevance of a dual interaction. Biol rev 94: 874-902 https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12481 |
[11] | Gu H, Zhao Q, Zhang Z (2017) Does scatter-hoarding of seeds benefit cache owners or pilferers? Integrat Zool 12: 477–488. |
[12] | Hou X. G., Yi X. F., Yang Y. Q. & Liu W. J. (2010) Acorn germination and seedling survival of Q. variabilis: effects of cotyledon excision. Ann Forest Sci 67: 711 DOI: 10.1051/forest/2010036. |
[13] | Huang Z Wang Y Zhang H Wu F Zhang Z (2011) Behavioural responses of sympatric rodents to complete pilferage. Animal Behaviour 81: 831-836. |
[14] | Li H, Zhang Z (2003) Effect of rodent on acorn dispersal and survival of the Liaodong oak (Quercus liaotungensis Koidz.). For Ecol and Manag 176: 387-396. |
[15] | Lichti NI, Steele MA, Swihar RK (2017) Seed fate and decision-making processes in scatter-hoarding rodents. Biol. Rev. 92: 474–504 doi: 10.1111/brv.12240. |
[16] | Luque-Larena JJ, Mougeot F, Viñuela J, Jareño D, Arroyo L, Lambin X, Arroyo B (2013) Recent large-scale range expansion and outbreaks of the common vole (Microtus arvalis) in NW Spain. Basic Appl Ecol 14: 432–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2013.04.006 |
[17] | Mittelman P, Pires AS, Fernandez FAS (2021) The intermediate dispersal hypothesis: seed dispersal is maximized in areas with intermediate usage by hoarders. Plant Ecol 222: 221–231 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-020-01100-6(01) |
[18] | Moore C M, Dittel J W (2020) On mutualism, models, and masting: the effects of seed-dispersing animals on the plants they disperse. Journal of Ecology 108: 1775–1783. |
[19] | Muñoz A, Bonal R (2008) Seed choice by rodents: learning or inheritance? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62: 913–922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0515-y |
[20] | Muñoz A, Bonal R (2011) Linking seed dispersal to cache protection strategies. J Ecol 99: 1016–1025 |
[21] | Paz A, Jareño D, Arroyo L, Viñuela J, Arroyo B, Mougeot F, Luque- Larena JJ, Fargallo JA (2012) Avian predators as a biological control system of common vole (Microtus arvalis) populations in North-Western Spain: experimental set-up and preliminary results. Pest 262: 1251–1257. |
[22] | Perea R, San Miguel A, Gil L (2011) Leftovers in seed dispersal: ecological implications of partial seed consumption for oak regeneration. J Ecol 99: 94-201. |
[23] | Pérez-Ramos IM, Marañón T (2008) Factors affecting post-dispersal seed predation in two coexisting oak species: microhabitat, burial and exclusion of large herbivores. For Ecol Manag 255: 3506–3514. |
[24] | Pérez-Ramos IM, Verdú JR, Numa C, Marañón T, Lobo JM (2013) The comparative effectiveness of rodents and dung beetles as local seed dispersers in Mediterranean oak forests. PLoS One 8: 77197. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077197 |
[25] | Pesendorfer MB, Sillett TS, Koenig WD, Morrison SA (2016) Scatter-hoarding corvids as seed dispersers for oaks and pines: A review of a widely distributed mutualism and its utility to habitat restoration. Am. Ornithol. Soc. 118: 215–237 DOI: 10.1650/CONDOR-15-125.1. |
[26] | Pinheiro J, Bates D (2000) Mixed-effects models in S and S-plus. Springer, New York. |
[27] | Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, The R Development Core Team (2013) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R Package Version 3: 1–108 https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme |
[28] | R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical com- puting. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, http:// www.R-project.org/ |
[29] | Sivy K J, Ostoja S M, Schupp E W, Durham S (2011) Effects of rodent species, seed species, and predator cues on seed fate. Acta Oecologica 37: 321-328. |
[30] | Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry, 3rd edn. W. H. Freeman and Co., New York. |
[31] | Steele M A, Rompré G, Stratford J A, Zhang H, Suchocki M, Marino S (2015) Scatterhoarding rodents favor higher predation risks for cache sites: The potential for predators to influence the seed dispersal process. Integrat Zool 10: 257–266. |
[32] | Sunyer P, Muñoz A, Bonal R, Espelta JM (2013) The ecology of seed dispersal by small rodents: a role for predator and conspecific scents. Funct Ecol 27: 1313–1321. |
[33] | Vander Wall SB (2001) The evolutionary ecology of nut dispersal. Bot Rev 67: 74–117. |
[34] | Vander Wall SB (2010) How plants manipulate the scatter-hoarding be- haviour of seed-dispersing animals. Philos Trans R Soc B 365: 989– 997. |
[35] | Xiao ZS, Zhang ZB, Wang YS (2005). Effects of seed size on dispersal distance in five rodent-dispersed fagaceous species. Act Oecol 28: 221–9. |
[36] | Xiao Z, Krebs CJ (2015) Modeling the costs and benefits of seed scatter- hoarding to plants. Ecosphere 6: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES14- 00438.1 |
[37] | Yang Y, Yi X (2012) Partial acorn consumption by small rodents: implication for regeneration of white oak, Quercus mongolica. Plant Ecol 213: 197-205 DOI 10.1007/s11258-011-0016-y. |
[38] | Yi X, Wang Z (2015) Context-dependent seed dispersal determines acorn survival of sympatric oak species. Plant Ecol 216: 123–132 DOI 10.1007/s11258-014-0421-0. |
[39] | Yi X, Wang Z, Liu C, Liu G, Zhang M (2015) Acorn cotyledons are larger than their seedlings’ need: evidence from artificial cutting experi- ments. Sci Rep 5: 8112. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08112 |
[40] | Wróbel A, Zwolak R (2017) Deciphering the effects of disperser assemblages and seed mass on patterns of seed dispersal in a rodent community. Integrat Zool 12: 457–467 doi: 10.1111/1749-4877.12265. |
[41] | Zhang HM, Chen Y, Zhang ZB (2008). Differences of dispersal fitness of large and small acorns of Liaodong oak (Quercus liaotungensis) before and after seed caching by small rodents in a warm temperate forest, China. For Ecol Manag 255: 1243–50. |
[42] | Zhang H, Wang Z, Zeng Q, Chang G (2015) Mutualistic and predatory interactions are driven by rodent body size and seed traits in a rodent–seed system in warm-temperate forest in northern China. Wildl Res 42: 149–157. |
[43] | Zhang H, Yan C, Chang G, Zhang Z (2016) Seed trait‑mediated selection by rodents affects mutualistic interactions and seedling recruitment of co‑occurring tree species. Oecol 180: 475–484 DOI 10.1007/s00442-015-3490-4. |
[44] | Zwolak R, Crone EE (2012) Quantifying the outcome of plant–granivore interactions. Oikos 121: 20–27 doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.019849.x. |
[45] | Zwolak R, Bogdziewicz M, Crone EE (2020) On the need to evaluate costs and benefits of synzoochory for plant populations. J. Ecol 00: 1–5 DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.13463. |
APA Style
Jose María Del Arco, Sergio Del Arco. (2022). Partial Consumption of Acorns by Some Rodents Leads Their Relationship with Oaks Species Towards Mutualism. Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, 7(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.eeb.20220701.11
ACS Style
Jose María Del Arco; Sergio Del Arco. Partial Consumption of Acorns by Some Rodents Leads Their Relationship with Oaks Species Towards Mutualism. Ecol. Evol. Biol. 2022, 7(1), 1-6. doi: 10.11648/j.eeb.20220701.11
AMA Style
Jose María Del Arco, Sergio Del Arco. Partial Consumption of Acorns by Some Rodents Leads Their Relationship with Oaks Species Towards Mutualism. Ecol Evol Biol. 2022;7(1):1-6. doi: 10.11648/j.eeb.20220701.11
@article{10.11648/j.eeb.20220701.11, author = {Jose María Del Arco and Sergio Del Arco}, title = {Partial Consumption of Acorns by Some Rodents Leads Their Relationship with Oaks Species Towards Mutualism}, journal = {Ecology and Evolutionary Biology}, volume = {7}, number = {1}, pages = {1-6}, doi = {10.11648/j.eeb.20220701.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.eeb.20220701.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.eeb.20220701.11}, abstract = {Numerous interactions between plants and animals vary in their outcome between predation and mutualism. Depending on the costs and benefits, the relationship is placed at one end of the scale or the other. A thin line separates both interactions. Acorn consumption by rodent species has been considered a predation relationship. Rodents consume acorns, which is a cost to oaks species as they are prevented from colonizing new places. The aim of this study is to show that part of the costs allocated to depredation due to loss of acorns cannot be allocated to costs. Some attacked acorns are partially consumed, but preserve their embryo and are not lost as they can germinate. This behavior, preserving the embryo, is observed in certain species. We will attempt to verify whether the behavior of conserving the embryo shown by some rodent species during partial consumption of acorns is intended to bring their relationship with oaks species closer to mutualism. To do this, we studied and compared the behavior of two acorns-consuming rodent species (Apodemus sylvaticus and Mus spretus) with another species that has never used this type of resources (Microtus arvalis), during acorns consumption. The results show that only two acorn-consuming species preserved the embryo, and not by species that are incorporating acorns into their diet. Species that have consumed acorns since ancient times show embryo-acorns preserving behavior. These species (Apodemus sylvaticus and Mus spretus) start consuming the acorns at the basal part, away from the embryo, at a higher energy expense, but they assume it because the mutualistic relationship they seek provides them with food guarantees in the future. This behavior is the contribution made by mutualistic rodents to maintain their relationship with oaks plants within the term of mutualism. Both species benefit from the relationship. Plants seeds are successfully transported to and germinated in suitable places and rodents obtain nutrients and the possibility of providing their offspring with future resources. The species not using acorns as food (Microtus arvalis) behaves as a predatory. The most convenient way for it to open the acorn is to devour the embryo, thus posing a threat to oak species.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Partial Consumption of Acorns by Some Rodents Leads Their Relationship with Oaks Species Towards Mutualism AU - Jose María Del Arco AU - Sergio Del Arco Y1 - 2022/01/28 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.eeb.20220701.11 DO - 10.11648/j.eeb.20220701.11 T2 - Ecology and Evolutionary Biology JF - Ecology and Evolutionary Biology JO - Ecology and Evolutionary Biology SP - 1 EP - 6 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-3762 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.eeb.20220701.11 AB - Numerous interactions between plants and animals vary in their outcome between predation and mutualism. Depending on the costs and benefits, the relationship is placed at one end of the scale or the other. A thin line separates both interactions. Acorn consumption by rodent species has been considered a predation relationship. Rodents consume acorns, which is a cost to oaks species as they are prevented from colonizing new places. The aim of this study is to show that part of the costs allocated to depredation due to loss of acorns cannot be allocated to costs. Some attacked acorns are partially consumed, but preserve their embryo and are not lost as they can germinate. This behavior, preserving the embryo, is observed in certain species. We will attempt to verify whether the behavior of conserving the embryo shown by some rodent species during partial consumption of acorns is intended to bring their relationship with oaks species closer to mutualism. To do this, we studied and compared the behavior of two acorns-consuming rodent species (Apodemus sylvaticus and Mus spretus) with another species that has never used this type of resources (Microtus arvalis), during acorns consumption. The results show that only two acorn-consuming species preserved the embryo, and not by species that are incorporating acorns into their diet. Species that have consumed acorns since ancient times show embryo-acorns preserving behavior. These species (Apodemus sylvaticus and Mus spretus) start consuming the acorns at the basal part, away from the embryo, at a higher energy expense, but they assume it because the mutualistic relationship they seek provides them with food guarantees in the future. This behavior is the contribution made by mutualistic rodents to maintain their relationship with oaks plants within the term of mutualism. Both species benefit from the relationship. Plants seeds are successfully transported to and germinated in suitable places and rodents obtain nutrients and the possibility of providing their offspring with future resources. The species not using acorns as food (Microtus arvalis) behaves as a predatory. The most convenient way for it to open the acorn is to devour the embryo, thus posing a threat to oak species. VL - 7 IS - 1 ER -